You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
hello-algo/en/docs/chapter_searching/replace_linear_by_hashing.md

2.2 KiB

Hash optimization strategies

In algorithm problems, we often reduce the time complexity of algorithms by replacing linear search with hash search. Let's use an algorithm problem to deepen understanding.

!!! question

Given an integer array `nums` and a target element `target`, please search for two elements in the array whose "sum" equals `target`, and return their array indices. Any solution is acceptable.

Linear search: trading time for space

Consider traversing all possible combinations directly. As shown in the figure below, we initiate a two-layer loop, and in each round, we determine whether the sum of the two integers equals target. If so, we return their indices.

Linear search solution for two-sum problem

The code is shown below:

[file]{two_sum}-[class]{}-[func]{two_sum_brute_force}

This method has a time complexity of O(n^2) and a space complexity of O(1), which is very time-consuming with large data volumes.

Hash search: trading space for time

Consider using a hash table, with key-value pairs being the array elements and their indices, respectively. Loop through the array, performing the steps shown in the figure below each round.

  1. Check if the number target - nums[i] is in the hash table. If so, directly return the indices of these two elements.
  2. Add the key-value pair nums[i] and index i to the hash table.

=== "<1>" Help hash table solve two-sum

=== "<2>" two_sum_hashtable_step2

=== "<3>" two_sum_hashtable_step3

The implementation code is shown below, requiring only a single loop:

[file]{two_sum}-[class]{}-[func]{two_sum_hash_table}

This method reduces the time complexity from O(n^2) to O(n) by using hash search, greatly improving the running efficiency.

As it requires maintaining an additional hash table, the space complexity is O(n). Nevertheless, this method has a more balanced time-space efficiency overall, making it the optimal solution for this problem.